Digital Cabinet

Polevaulter Donkeyman's rants, raves musings and flame wars

Posts Tagged ‘Jon Stewart

12 year old girls are shallow

leave a comment »

Or atleast Samantha Bee of the Daily Show thinks so. At around the 12′ 20” mark

Bee: Let’s say that I am a 12 year old girl and you are a 12 year old boy. Explain your idea about branding the Reublican party to me.
Norquist: OK. The goal is to make it easier for people … (interrupted)
Bee (speaking in the manner she presumably believes 12 year old girls do): Oh my God guys … there’s a like a nerd talking to me about something.
Norquist: If you want to know who you are voting for its helful if there is some sort of brand identification
Bee: Whaaat?
Norquist: One party wants to raise your taxes, one won’t. Makes it easier for you to choose … (interrupted)
Bee: I don’t even know what he’s saying. Oh my God guys, he has like a piece of fruit rollups stuck in his beard. Alright fine! I will make out with you, but nothing south of the equator.
(Bee moves towards Norquist with her eyes closed and mouth open)

Written by Polevaulter Donkeyman

March 2, 2012 at 03:06

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

Jon Stewart is such a shill

leave a comment »

On the February 13, 2012 episode of the Daily Show, Jon Stewart cuts to Obama pretending to back down on his mandate that workplaces affiliated with religious bodies (e.g. affiliated to the Catholic Church) need to pay for contraception in the health plans they offer to their employees (around the 5’20” mark) — .

If a woman’s employer is a charity or a hospital that has a religious objection to providing contraceptive services as a part of their health plan, the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity, will be required to reach out and offer the woman contraceptive care free of charge. Religious organizations won’t have to pay for these services and no religious institution will have to provide these services directly.
— Barack Obama

Thankfully, Steve Landsburg and Greg Mankiw come to the rescue .

That’s because all economists understands that transferring the responsibility from employers to insurers amounts to transferring the cost from insurance buyers to insurance buyers, which is to say that it’s not a change in policy. One of the first and most important lessons we teach our students is well summarized by a slogan: “The economic burden of a tax is independent of the legal burden”. Ditto for a mandated insurance purchase. It is not the law, but the underlying price-sensitivities of buyers and sellers, that determines where the burden ultimately falls.

For Stewart’s sake I hope Obama loses.

Written by Polevaulter Donkeyman

February 15, 2012 at 01:51